Feminism in Sor Juana Essay -- Sor Juana Estela Portillo Trambley Essa

Feminism in Sor Juana In Estela Portillo Trambleys period of play Sor Juana the main character Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz was considered to be one of the earliest feminists. Sor Juanas eternal skins to study and unshakable craving for knowledge and wisdom, from whatever seminal fluid it may be, support this attribute. In my opinion however, there are likewise significant elements of the play that suggest that Sor Juana would non be considered a align feminist. Of these reasons, there are three major ones that I leave psychoanalyse. The out manage reason is that Sor Juana gave up her engagement for the acquirement of knowledge from books and settled for see from religiously accepted writing, essentially giving up what she had been originally fleck for and abandoning her previous ideals. Secondly, Sor Juana only fought for herself and what she wanted to pursue. She did non fight for other women or in other political, economic, or social spheres. Finally, the play fails to identify how Sor Juana set any kind of former or example by accomplishing anything that women sooner her had never accomplished. In the remainder of this essay I will analyze how Trambleys representation of Sor Juana is that of a woman c formerlyrned only with her have desires and alike a woman that gave up her struggle for personal rights that she had once been so motivated to attain prior to setting any precedent for women as a group. One major reason that I do not consider Sor Juana to be the Americas root Feminist is that she gave up her struggle for what she originally wanted so badly. In the beginning, Sor Juana went through so some(prenominal) and worked so hard to learn and read and attain knowledge. She seemed so strong, spirit past being laughed at and not taken seriously and go on her quest to study. She began to give in and her original goals started to slip away. and the Church will let me learn. (151). This quote illustrates how Sor Juana joined the con vent to be able to learn because she was not allowed to learn otherwise. Sor Juana settled for life in a convent. She was then coerce to live a stricter lifestyle and was limited in her reading materials. It seems she complied with secondary struggle. Then she felt guilty for having used God in the scratch line place to help her achieve her goal. This led to the abandonment of her original excogitation altogether. Sor Juana says, My whole life was s... ...hown to support the idea that Sor Juana accomplished anything that women before her did not accomplish. Sor Juana says herself, I am only a woman incapable of changing worlds. (184). This is also a main reason that Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, as she was correspond in Trambleys play, is not truly the Americas First Feminist. In conclusion, the reasons I have discussed above are sufficient evidence to show that Sor Juana, as she is represented in Trambleys play is not truly the Americas First Feminist. Assertive and intelligent she was, but determined to make any remove to the inequality experienced by women by being anything other than a precedent she was not. Also preventing her from being a true feminist is the point that she was unsuccessful in accomplishing something that no woman had done before. Sor Juana abandoned her struggle to follow her dreams of pursuing something that no woman had ever accomplished prior. She was also unconcerned with the plight of other women, only her own desires to pursue her dreams. Ultimately, get just another obedient woman following the constraints of society is what prevents Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz from being a true feminist.