Feedback Stress: Does Auditory Feedback Negatively Affect Performance o

In his historic study, Stroop prepare that construe names of tincts interfered with individuals ability to name the ink ruse the countersignature was printed in when the two differed (i.e., the word BLUE written in red ink) (1935). However, the basis of this phenomenon can be traced back to Cattell who found that label wrings and pictures took twice as long to accomplish than reading the word these food colors or pictures represented (1886). He concluded that this was due to reading being an automatic attend to while identifying colors or pictures requires a conscious effort (Cattell, 1886). MacLeod (1991) reflects that it was Cattells work which strongly influenced future psychologist including Stroop.In his experiment, Stroop investigated how the reaction time to name colors increased when it conflicted with the automatic process of reading. He broke down his experiment into three parts. In the first, he tested how reading the name of a color printed in a different in k color (i.e., BLUE) differed from reading the name of a color printed in black ink (i.e., BLUE). The difference between the name of the color and the ink color it was printed in caused a slight to-do resulting in an increased reaction time of 2.3 seconds (Stroop, 1935). In the second part of his experiment, Stroop (1935) looked at reaction time differences between designation the color of solid blocks (i.e., ) versus naming the color of the ink not the name of the color (i.e., responding RED for BLUE). He found that participants required 74% more time to name the color of the ink when it did not agree with the name of the color (Stroop, 1935). Stroop concluded that it was the baulk between the automatic process of reading the names of the colored w... ...oop An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging validation study with functional MRI. gay Brain Mapping, 6(4), 270-282. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)64Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to s ee and name objects. Mind, 11(41), 63-65.MacLeod, C. M. (1991). half(a) a century of research on the Stroop Effect An integrative review. psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163-203. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163Richards, A., French, C. C., Johnson, W. Naparstek, J., & Williams, J. (1992). Effects of mood manipulation and anxiety on cognitive process of an emotional Stroop task. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 479-491.Shor, R. E. (1975). An auditory analog of the Stroop test. Journal of habitual Psychology, 93, 281-288.Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662.